Parrish v. State
This text of 99 S.E. 634 (Parrish v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. The court did not err “in failing to charge the jury that they must find the defendants guilty of every material allegation alleged in the accusation;” or “in failing to charge the jury that it must find the alleged offense was committed within two years of the date of the filing of the accusation.” If these instructions had been given to the jury, the defendants could have justly complained that the court virtually directed a verdict in favor of the State.
2. The evidence amply authorized, if it did not demand, the verdict returned, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
99 S.E. 634, 24 Ga. App. 16, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 385, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parrish-v-state-gactapp-1919.