Parrish v. State

815 So. 2d 783, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 6536, 2002 WL 971331
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Parrish v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 780 So. 2d 287
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 13, 2002·No. No. 1D00-1136·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, Thomas H. Parrish, appeals the denial of a motion filed pursuant to Rule 3.850 of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. We find little difference between this case and either Williams v. State, 472 So.2d 738 (Fla.1985), or Rogers v. State, 702 So.2d 607 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997), review denied, 717 So.2d 538 (Fla.1998). We therefore hold the trial judge abused his discretion in denying appellant’s request for appointed counsel at the evidentiary hearing. The order on appeal is REVERSED and the case is REMANDED to the trial court for a new hearing with appointed counsel.

BARFIELD, WOLF, and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Parrish v. State, 815 So. 2d 783, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 6536, 2002 WL 971331 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

815 So. 2d 783 (Parrish v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rogers v. State
702 So. 2d 607 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Williams v. State
472 So. 2d 738 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1985)