Parrish v. State
687 So. 2d 367, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 988, 1997 WL 55702
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Parrish v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 8661 →
Opinion
Based on the reasoning of our recent opinion in Freeman v. State, 679 So.2d 364 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996), we affirm the denial of appellant’s rule 3.850 motion but again certify to the supreme court the same question certified in Freeman:
IS STATE v. GRAY, 654 So.2d 552 (Fla.1995), RETROACTIVE?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Parrish v. State, 687 So. 2d 367, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 988, 1997 WL 55702 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).
687 So. 2d 367 (Parrish v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Freeman v. State
679 So. 2d 364 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
State v. Gray
654 So. 2d 552 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1995)