Parrish v. State

687 So. 2d 367, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 988, 1997 WL 55702
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 12, 1997
DocketNo. 97-0116
StatusPublished

This text of 687 So. 2d 367 (Parrish v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Parrish v. State, 687 So. 2d 367, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 988, 1997 WL 55702 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Based on the reasoning of our recent opinion in Freeman v. State, 679 So.2d 364 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996), we affirm the denial of appellant’s rule 3.850 motion but again certify to the supreme court the same question certified in Freeman:

IS STATE v. GRAY, 654 So.2d 552 (Fla.1995), RETROACTIVE?
DELL, PARIENTE and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Freeman v. State
679 So. 2d 364 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
State v. Gray
654 So. 2d 552 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
687 So. 2d 367, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 988, 1997 WL 55702, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parrish-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.