Parrish v. State

617 So. 2d 1170, 1993 WL 167714
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 21, 1993·No. 92-391·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

617 So.2d 1170 (1993)

Barry PARRISH, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 92-391.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

May 21, 1993.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Daniel J. Schafer, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.

Barry Parrish, pro se.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Barbara Arlene Fink, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.

DAUKSCH, Judge.

This is an appeal from a sentence in an aggravated battery case. Appellant was on probation for the aggravated battery and violated terms of his probation. When he came to court for sentencing the judge used a new, revised, updated sentencing guideline scoresheet to find the proper allowable sentence. This was error. The original scoresheet should have been used; the one prepared and used at his original sentencing hearing when he got probation. Holloman v. State, 600 So.2d 522 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992).

SENTENCE VACATED; REMANDED for RESENTENCING.

W. SHARP and PETERSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Parrish v. State, 617 So. 2d 1170, 1993 WL 167714 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

617 So. 2d 1170 (Parrish v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Aller v. State
792 So. 2d 692 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Harris v. State
771 So. 2d 565 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Wilson v. State
648 So. 2d 1219 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Smith v. State
629 So. 2d 281 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)