Parrish v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Parrish v. State

155 So. 756, 115 Fla. 540, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1635

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Parrish v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 105 Fla. 430 →

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided June 21, 1934·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff in error was indicted, being charged with the offense of murder in the first degree. He was convicted of murder in the second degree. His defense was on the theory that in perpetrating the homicide he acted in lawful self-defense.

The testimony was conflicting, but was sufficient to constitute the basis for the verdict rendered. We find no reversible error disclosed by the record.

*541 The judgment is affirmed.

Davis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff in error was indicted, being charged with the offense of murder in the first degree. He was convicted of murder in the second degree. His defense was on the theory that in perpetrating the homicide he acted in lawful self-defense.

The testimony was conflicting, but was sufficient to constitute the basis for the verdict rendered. We find no reversible error disclosed by the record.

*541 The judgment is affirmed.

Davis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.

Parrish v. State, 155 So. 756, 115 Fla. 540, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1635 (Fla. 1934).

Pincite

155 So. 756 (Parrish v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.