Parrish v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Parrish v. State

155 So. 756, 115 Fla. 540, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1635

DecidedJune 21, 1934

StatusPublished

This text of 155 So. 756 (Parrish v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Parrish v. State, 155 So. 756, 115 Fla. 540, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1635 (Fla. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff in error was indicted, being charged with the offense of murder in the first degree. He was convicted of murder in the second degree. His defense was on the theory that in perpetrating the homicide he acted in lawful self-defense.

The testimony was conflicting, but was sufficient to constitute the basis for the verdict rendered. We find no reversible error disclosed by the record.

*541 The judgment is affirmed.

Davis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff in error was indicted, being charged with the offense of murder in the first degree. He was convicted of murder in the second degree. His defense was on the theory that in perpetrating the homicide he acted in lawful self-defense.

The testimony was conflicting, but was sufficient to constitute the basis for the verdict rendered. We find no reversible error disclosed by the record.

*541 The judgment is affirmed.

Davis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

155 So. 756, 115 Fla. 540, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1635, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parrish-v-state-fla-1934.