Parrish v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Parrish v. State

180 So. 126, 28 Ala. App. 142, 1938 Ala. App. LEXIS 86

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 22, 1938

Docket8 Div. 539.

StatusPublished

This text of 180 So. 126 (Parrish v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Parrish v. State, 180 So. 126, 28 Ala. App. 142, 1938 Ala. App. LEXIS 86 (Ala. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

RICE, Judge.

Appellant was tried under an indictment, charging him with the offense of murder, in' the second degree. He was convicted of the, crime of manslaughter in the first degree, and his punishment fixed at imprisonment in the penitentiary for the term of three years.

There is really not much that needs to be! said. There were very few exceptions reserved on the taking of testimony; and a, consideration of those appearing reveals that they are so obviously without merit as to require no separate mention.

■ Clearly, the evidence made a case for the jury.

■ The written charges requested by appellant — and refused — have each been examined, in the light of those given by the court, as well as in the light of the excellent oral-charge delivered by the court. So examin *143 ed, it plainly appears that no error was committed with reference to any such charge.

This case was properly tried; and there are no errors in the record.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI