Parrish v. Presbytery of Giddings-Love-Joy, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Parrish v. Presbytery of Giddings-Love-Joy, Inc.

193 S.W.3d 799, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 840

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 13, 2006

DocketNo. ED 86699

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 193 S.W.3d 799 (Parrish v. Presbytery of Giddings-Love-Joy, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Parrish v. Presbytery of Giddings-Love-Joy, Inc., 193 S.W.3d 799, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 840 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The above styled order handed down on June 6, 2006 is hereby withdrawn. Opinion is reissued this date.

SO ORDERED.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Appellants, Steven D. Parrish and El Tovar Incorporated, appeal the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying their request for a preliminary injunction.

We only have jurisdiction over final judgments that dispose of all parties and issues in the case. Hair Kraz, Inc. v. Schuchardt, 131 S.W.3d 854, 854 (Mo.App. E.D.2004). Generally, an appeal will not he from the denial of a preliminary injunction. Id.

The trial court’s amended judgment denied Appellants’ request for a preliminary injunction, but there was no denial or grant of a request for a permanent injunction within the amended judgment. Therefore, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI