Parrish v. Presbytery of Giddings-Love-Joy, Inc.

193 S.W.3d 799, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 840
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 13, 2006·No. No. ED 86699·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

The above styled order handed down on June 6, 2006 is hereby withdrawn. Opinion is reissued this date.

SO ORDERED.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Appellants, Steven D. Parrish and El Tovar Incorporated, appeal the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying their request for a preliminary injunction.

We only have jurisdiction over final judgments that dispose of all parties and issues in the case. Hair Kraz, Inc. v. Schuchardt, 131 S.W.3d 854, 854 (Mo.App. E.D.2004). Generally, an appeal will not he from the denial of a preliminary injunction. Id.

The trial court’s amended judgment denied Appellants’ request for a preliminary injunction, but there was no denial or grant of a request for a permanent injunction within the amended judgment. Therefore, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Parrish v. Presbytery of Giddings-Love-Joy, Inc., 193 S.W.3d 799, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 840 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

193 S.W.3d 799 (Parrish v. Presbytery of Giddings-Love-Joy, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Parrish v. PRESBYTERY OF GIDDINGS-LOVEJOY
193 S.W.3d 799 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2006)