Parrish v. Parrish

742 N.E.2d 145, 91 Ohio St. 3d 1447, 2001 Ohio LEXIS 418
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 14, 2001
Docket00-1963
StatusPublished

This text of 742 N.E.2d 145 (Parrish v. Parrish) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Parrish v. Parrish, 742 N.E.2d 145, 91 Ohio St. 3d 1447, 2001 Ohio LEXIS 418 (Ohio 2001).

Opinion

Ross App. No. 98CA2470. Discretionary appeal and motion for admission pro hac vice of Jeremiah B. McKenna by Katherine Hine allowed.

F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
742 N.E.2d 145, 91 Ohio St. 3d 1447, 2001 Ohio LEXIS 418, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parrish-v-parrish-ohio-2001.