Parrish v. Parrish

432 S.W.2d 632
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky
DecidedOctober 11, 1968
StatusPublished

This text of 432 S.W.2d 632 (Parrish v. Parrish) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Parrish v. Parrish, 432 S.W.2d 632 (Ky. Ct. App. 1968).

Opinion

MONTGOMERY, Chief Justice.

Georgia Cox Parrish appeals from an order awarding the custody of her two children to her husband, Bobby Parrish. The chancellor found that “the best interests of the children will be served by their remaining with their father in the home of the grandparents.” It was ordered that the father retain the custody of the children, with the mother to have certain visitation rights.

It is apparent from the memorandum and order of the court, which constitutes the record on appeal, that the chancellor heard testimony before entry of the order from which the appeal has been taken. The testimony does not appear in the record by transcript or otherwise, nor do the pleadings. The rule is that in the absence of a transcript of the evidence it is presumed that the testimony heard supports the findings of fact of the chancellor. Sil-liman v. Falls City Stone Company, Ky., 305 S.W.2d 322; Tucker v. Tucker, Ky., 398 S.W.2d 238. The burden is on the appellant to show the error of the judgment. This has not been done.

Judgment affirmed.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Silliman v. Falls City Stone Company
305 S.W.2d 322 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1957)
Tucker v. Tucker
398 S.W.2d 238 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1965)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
432 S.W.2d 632, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parrish-v-parrish-kyctapp-1968.