Parrish v. Nelson
378 S.W.3d 422, 2012 WL 4355506, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1187
Opinion
Order
This is an adverse possession case. The issue is whether there was substantial evidence to support the trial court’s conclusion that the plaintiff adversely possessed some, but not all, of the disputed property. Because we find that there was, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Parrish v. Nelson, 378 S.W.3d 422, 2012 WL 4355506, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1187 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).
378 S.W.3d 422 (Parrish v. Nelson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.