Parrish v. Matthews

548 So. 2d 725, 1989 WL 88050
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 8, 1989
Docket88-3063
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 548 So. 2d 725 (Parrish v. Matthews) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Parrish v. Matthews, 548 So. 2d 725, 1989 WL 88050 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

548 So.2d 725 (1989)

Roberta PARRISH and George Parrish, Her Husband, Appellants,
v.
Walter MATTHEWS and Delores Matthews, Appellees.

No. 88-3063.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

August 8, 1989.
Rehearing Denied October 9, 1989.

Jack H. Cohen, Miami, for appellants.

Nelson & Tacher and David L. Willing, Miami, for appellees.

Before FERGUSON, COPE and LEVY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Appellants, who were plaintiffs below, appeal an adverse summary judgment. Plaintiff Roberta Parrish performed domestic services in the home of appellees. While ascending a staircase within the house, plaintiff slipped on a piece of wrapping paper which had been left on the stairs. She brought suit for injuries sustained when she fell, and her husband made a claim for loss of consortium. When, as here, the injury occurred as a result of a condition the plaintiff was engaged to correct, summary judgment was properly entered for defendants. McCarty v. Dade Division of American Hospital Supply, 360 So.2d 436 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); see also Storr v. Proctor, 490 So.2d 135, 136 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied (Fla. 1986); Crawford v. Miller, 542 So.2d 1050 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). The cases relied on by plaintiffs are not on point. See Westberry v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 191 So.2d 613 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966) (grocery store stockroom employees failed to clean up vegetable debris across which plaintiff had to cross); Beebe v. Kaplan, 177 So.2d 869 (Fla. 3d DCA 1965) (employer homeowner told employee to hurry across poorly lit patio at night).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Green v. Ebsary Foundation Co.
920 So. 2d 127 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Ball v. Jimenez
730 So. 2d 703 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Walker v. Mathis
678 So. 2d 2 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Velez v. Allied Plating Supplies, Inc.
666 So. 2d 596 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Houk v. Monsanto Co.
609 So. 2d 757 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Stetler v. Estate of Patterson
595 So. 2d 579 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
548 So. 2d 725, 1989 WL 88050, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parrish-v-matthews-fladistctapp-1989.