Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Parrish v. Chiles

Parrish v. Chiles

602 So. 2d 987, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 8763, 1992 WL 176972
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 29, 1992
DocketNo. 91-1049
StatusPublished

This text of 602 So. 2d 987 (Parrish v. Chiles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Parrish v. Chiles, 602 So. 2d 987, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 8763, 1992 WL 176972 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the appeal from the order denying appellant’s petition for mandamus as moot, it appearing that the Department of Corrections had made the requested corrections to appellant’s gain-time pursuant to Raske v. Martinez, 876 F.2d 1496 (11th Cir.1989), and Waldrup v. Dugger, 562 So.2d 687 (Fla.1990). This affirmance is without prejudice to appellant’s right to pursue administrative remedies to chai-[988]*988lenge the correctness of the amount of gain-time granted under those decisions.

AFFIRMED.

ZEHMER, WOLF, and KAHN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jeffrey Raske v. Bob Martinez, Governor, State of Florida, and Richard Dugger, Secretary, Department of Corrections
876 F.2d 1496 (Eleventh Circuit, 1989)
Waldrup v. Dugger
562 So. 2d 687 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
602 So. 2d 987, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 8763, 1992 WL 176972, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parrish-v-chiles-fladistctapp-1992.