Parrish v. Chiles

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Parrish v. Chiles

602 So. 2d 987, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 8763, 1992 WL 176972

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 29, 1992·No. No. 91-1049·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the appeal from the order denying appellant’s petition for mandamus as moot, it appearing that the Department of Corrections had made the requested corrections to appellant’s gain-time pursuant to Raske v. Martinez, 876 F.2d 1496 (11th Cir.1989), and Waldrup v. Dugger, 562 So.2d 687 (Fla.1990). This affirmance is without prejudice to appellant’s right to pursue administrative remedies to chai-[988] lenge the correctness of the amount of gain-time granted under those decisions.

AFFIRMED.

ZEHMER, WOLF, and KAHN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the appeal from the order denying appellant’s petition for mandamus as moot, it appearing that the Department of Corrections had made the requested corrections to appellant’s gain-time pursuant to Raske v. Martinez, 876 F.2d 1496 (11th Cir.1989), and Waldrup v. Dugger, 562 So.2d 687 (Fla.1990). This affirmance is without prejudice to appellant’s right to pursue administrative remedies to chai-[988] lenge the correctness of the amount of gain-time granted under those decisions.

AFFIRMED.

ZEHMER, WOLF, and KAHN, JJ., concur.

Parrish v. Chiles, 602 So. 2d 987, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 8763, 1992 WL 176972 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

602 So. 2d 987 (Parrish v. Chiles) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related