Parrish v. Bob Keefer Plymouth, Inc.

California Supreme Court

Parrish v. Bob Keefer Plymouth, Inc.

58 Cal. 2d 920, 22 Cal. Rptr. 663

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedJune 21, 1962

DocketL. A. No. 26299

StatusPublished

This text of 58 Cal. 2d 920 (Parrish v. Bob Keefer Plymouth, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Parrish v. Bob Keefer Plymouth, Inc., 58 Cal. 2d 920, 22 Cal. Rptr. 663 (Cal. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

SCHAUER, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment for plaintiffs in an action to declare unenforceable a conditional sale contract for the sale of an automobile and to recover the amount of plaintiffs’ down payment on such automobile.

The trial court based its judgment upon the following conclusion of law: ‘‘That the Conditional Sales Contract . . . violated the provisions of [now former] Civil Code Section 2982 (a) 5, in that the description, ‘License and Registration $27.00’ is not a sufficient compliance with the provisions of that section.”

Such conclusion is untenable. The quoted language constitutes full compliance with the subject section. (See Stasher v. Harger-Haldeman, ante, p. 23 [22 Cal.Rptr. 657, 372 P.2d 649].)

The judgment is reversed.

Gibson, C. J., Traynor, J., Me Comb, J., Peters, J., White, J., and Dooling, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI