Parris v. Wilson

575 F. App'x 169
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJune 6, 2014
DocketNo. 14-6141
StatusPublished

This text of 575 F. App'x 169 (Parris v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Parris v. Wilson, 575 F. App'x 169 (4th Cir. 2014).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Dewayne Antonio Parris, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error because Parris is not entitled to relief under Alleyne v. United States, — U.S. -, 133 S.Ct. 2151, 186 L.Ed.2d 314 (2013). Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Alleyne v. United States
133 S. Ct. 2151 (Supreme Court, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
575 F. App'x 169, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parris-v-wilson-ca4-2014.