Parris v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Parris v. State

194 S.W. 1111, 81 Tex. Crim. 225

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided May 2, 1917·No. No. 4457·Published

Opinion

DAVIDSON, P. J.

Appellant was convicted of swindling, and his punishment assessed at 30 days in jail in addition to a fine of $25.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bill of exceptions. There is nothing in the motion for a new trial that can be considered in the absence of evidence. There is a motion for a continuance in the’ record, but a bill of exceptions was not reserved to the court’s refusal to grant it. Therefore it cannot be considered.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DAVIDSON, P. J.

Appellant was convicted of swindling, and his punishment assessed at 30 days in jail in addition to a fine of $25.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bill of exceptions. There is nothing in the motion for a new trial that can be considered in the absence of evidence. There is a motion for a continuance in the’ record, but a bill of exceptions was not reserved to the court’s refusal to grant it. Therefore it cannot be considered.

The judgment is affirmed.

Parris v. State, 194 S.W. 1111, 81 Tex. Crim. 225 (Tex. 1917).

Pincite

194 S.W. 1111 (Parris v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.