Parris v. Bellows's Estate
52 Vt. 351
Opinion
[353]*353The opinion of the court was delivered by
The admission 'of the memorandum book was error. It contains, as the plaintiff claims, the memorandum of a fact, made by himself. He is by statute denied the right to testify to that fact; and he cannot make a memorandum that shall be legal evidence of that fact. The case is identical in principle with Jewett v. Winship, 42 Vt. 204, and Lapham v. Kelly, 35 Vt. 195, and the reasons given in those cases we deem sound in this.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Parris v. Bellows's Estate, 52 Vt. 351 (Vt. 1880).
52 Vt. 351 (Parris v. Bellows's Estate) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Stockwell v. Stockwell's Estate
105 A. 30 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1918)
Post v. Kenerson
52 L.R.A. 552 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1900)
Gleason & Field v. L. T. Kinney's Administrator
65 Vt. 560 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1893)
Wyman v. Wilcox's Estate
66 Vt. 26 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1893)