Parris Bentz v. Dick Moore Michael Groose Steve Long Dave Dormire Charlie Davis David Dobson

Eighth Circuit

Parris Bentz v. Dick Moore Michael Groose Steve Long Dave Dormire Charlie Davis David Dobson

37 F.3d 1503, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 35966, 1994 WL 568368

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedOctober 19, 1994

Docket93-2870

StatusPublished

This text of 37 F.3d 1503 (Parris Bentz v. Dick Moore Michael Groose Steve Long Dave Dormire Charlie Davis David Dobson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Parris Bentz v. Dick Moore Michael Groose Steve Long Dave Dormire Charlie Davis David Dobson, 37 F.3d 1503, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 35966, 1994 WL 568368 (8th Cir. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

37 F.3d 1503
NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that no party may cite an opinion not intended for publication unless the cases are related by identity between the parties or the causes of action.

Parris BENTZ, Appellant,
v.
Dick MOORE; Michael Groose; Steve Long; Dave Dormire;
Charlie Davis; David Dobson, Appellees.

No. 93-2870.

United States Court of Appeals,
Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 3, 1994.
Filed: Oct. 19, 1994.

Before MAGILL, Circuit Judge, GIBSON, Senior Circuit Judge, BEAM, Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Parris K. Bentz, a Missouri inmate, appeals from the district court's1 entry of summary judgment in favor of defendant prison officials in his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action. Bentz alleged that, in connection with a disciplinary proceeding, defendants violated his due process rights by upgrading a conduct violation for assault on a correction officer from a minor charge to a major one, by finding him guilty based on the correction officer's conduct violation report, and by denying his grievances after he was found guilty by the disciplinary committee. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties' briefs, we find no error of fact or law requiring reversal and conclude that an opinion would lack precedential value. The judgment of the district court is affirmed without further discussion.

AFFIRMED. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

The Honorable Scott O. Wright, Senior United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

37 F.3d 1503
NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that no party may cite an opinion not intended for publication unless the cases are related by identity between the parties or the causes of action.

Parris BENTZ, Appellant,
v.
Dick MOORE; Michael Groose; Steve Long; Dave Dormire;
Charlie Davis; David Dobson, Appellees.

No. 93-2870.

United States Court of Appeals,
Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 3, 1994.
Filed: Oct. 19, 1994.

Before MAGILL, Circuit Judge, GIBSON, Senior Circuit Judge, BEAM, Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Parris K. Bentz, a Missouri inmate, appeals from the district court's1 entry of summary judgment in favor of defendant prison officials in his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action. Bentz alleged that, in connection with a disciplinary proceeding, defendants violated his due process rights by upgrading a conduct violation for assault on a correction officer from a minor charge to a major one, by finding him guilty based on the correction officer's conduct violation report, and by denying his grievances after he was found guilty by the disciplinary committee. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties' briefs, we find no error of fact or law requiring reversal and conclude that an opinion would lack precedential value. The judgment of the district court is affirmed without further discussion.

AFFIRMED. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

The Honorable Scott O. Wright, Senior United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

37 F.3d 1503, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 35966, 1994 WL 568368, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parris-bentz-v-dick-moore-michael-groose-steve-lon-ca8-1994.