Parrini v. Parrini
This text of 226 So. 2d 829 (Parrini v. Parrini) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The judgment, which imposed an equitable lien on appellants’ property and which retained jurisdiction for the foreclosure of the lien in the event the sum due ap-pellee is not repaid within the time provided in the judgment, is affirmed on the authority of Hullum v. Bre-Lew Corp., Fla. 1957, 93 So.2d 727; Folsom v. Farmers’ Bank of Vero Beach, 1931, 102 Fla. 899, 136 So. 524; Craven v. Hartley, 1931, 102 Fla. 282, 135 So. 899; Jones v. Carpenter, 1925, 90 Fla. 407, 106 So. 127, 43 A.L.R. 1409; International Realty Associates v. McAdoo, 1924, 87 Fla. 1, 99 So. 117; and Tucker v. Prevatt Builders, Inc., Fla.App. 1959, 116 So.2d 437.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
226 So. 2d 829, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parrini-v-parrini-fladistctapp-1969.