Parrini v. Parrini

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Parrini v. Parrini

226 So. 2d 829

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 3, 1969·No. No. 2588·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment, which imposed an equitable lien on appellants’ property and which retained jurisdiction for the foreclosure of the lien in the event the sum due ap-pellee is not repaid within the time provided in the judgment, is affirmed on the authority of Hullum v. Bre-Lew Corp., Fla. 1957, 93 So.2d 727; Folsom v. Farmers’ Bank of Vero Beach, 1931, 102 Fla. 899, 136 So. 524; Craven v. Hartley, 1931, 102 Fla. 282, 135 So. 899; Jones v. Carpenter, 1925, 90 Fla. 407, 106 So. 127, 43 A.L.R. 1409; International Realty Associates v. McAdoo, 1924, 87 Fla. 1, 99 So. 117; and Tucker v. Prevatt Builders, Inc., Fla.App. 1959, 116 So.2d 437.

WALDEN, REED and OWEN, JJ., conCUr‘

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The judgment, which imposed an equitable lien on appellants’ property and which retained jurisdiction for the foreclosure of the lien in the event the sum due ap-pellee is not repaid within the time provided in the judgment, is affirmed on the authority of Hullum v. Bre-Lew Corp., Fla. 1957, 93 So.2d 727; Folsom v. Farmers’ Bank of Vero Beach, 1931, 102 Fla. 899, 136 So. 524; Craven v. Hartley, 1931, 102 Fla. 282, 135 So. 899; Jones v. Carpenter, 1925, 90 Fla. 407, 106 So. 127, 43 A.L.R. 1409; International Realty Associates v. McAdoo, 1924, 87 Fla. 1, 99 So. 117; and Tucker v. Prevatt Builders, Inc., Fla.App. 1959, 116 So.2d 437.

WALDEN, REED and OWEN, JJ., conCUr‘

Parrini v. Parrini, 226 So. 2d 829 (Fla. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

226 So. 2d 829 (Parrini v. Parrini) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related