Parrilla v. Rosenberg
This text of 301 A.D.2d 467 (Parrilla v. Rosenberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Kenneth Thompson, J.), entered June 28, 2002, which granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Summary judgment dismissing the complaint was properly granted in the absence of evidence sufficient to raise a triable issue as to whether the claimed hazard existed much less as to whether defendant property owners created or had notice, actual or constructive, of any such hazard (see Dombrower v Maharia Realty Corp., 296 AD2d 353). Concur — Andrias, J.P., Ellerin, Lerner, Friedman and Marlow, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
301 A.D.2d 467, 753 N.Y.S.2d 834, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 639, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parrilla-v-rosenberg-nyappdiv-2003.