Parrett v. State

39 So. 2d 272, 205 Miss. 651, 1949 Miss. LEXIS 455
Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided March 14, 1949·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Roberds, J.

Appellant was convicted of burglary and larceny, and sentenced to the penitentiary for five years.

*653 On this appeal he argues oxily oxie alleged error in the lower court, and that was the refusal of the court to grant to him the following instruction:

“The Court instructs the jury for the defendaxit that the defendant is a competent witness in his own behalf and you have no right to discard his testimony or to look upon his testimony with suspicion merely because he is; the defendant. If you have no reason to disbelieve him other than the fact that he is the defendant then you should believe his testimony to be the truth.”

This instruction was condemned by this Court in the cases of Coleman v. State, Miss., 22 So. (2d) 410, and Conn v. State, Miss., 1949, 38 So. (2d) 697.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Parrett v. State, 39 So. 2d 272, 205 Miss. 651, 1949 Miss. LEXIS 455 (Mich. 1949).

39 So. 2d 272 (Parrett v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Baker v. State
391 So. 2d 1010 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1980)
Walters v. State
391 So. 2d 645 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1980)
McNamee v. State
313 So. 2d 392 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1975)