Parrett v. State
This text of 39 So. 2d 272 (Parrett v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant was convicted of burglary and larceny, and sentenced to the penitentiary for five years.
*653 On this appeal he argues oxily oxie alleged error in the lower court, and that was the refusal of the court to grant to him the following instruction:
“The Court instructs the jury for the defendaxit that the defendant is a competent witness in his own behalf and you have no right to discard his testimony or to look upon his testimony with suspicion merely because he is; the defendant. If you have no reason to disbelieve him other than the fact that he is the defendant then you should believe his testimony to be the truth.”
This instruction was condemned by this Court in the cases of Coleman v. State, Miss., 22 So. (2d) 410, and Conn v. State, Miss., 1949, 38 So. (2d) 697.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
39 So. 2d 272, 205 Miss. 651, 1949 Miss. LEXIS 455, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parrett-v-state-miss-1949.