Parramore v. Cohn

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Parramore v. Cohn

116 F. 1022, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 5074

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

DecidedJune 19, 1902

StatusPublished

This text of 116 F. 1022 (Parramore v. Cohn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Parramore v. Cohn, 116 F. 1022, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 5074 (circtsdny 1902).

Pincite

Opinion

LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

The patent has been sustained and construed by the court of appeals, and the devices of defendant are infringements under that construction. The prior patents which are presented here, but were not before the court of appeals, seem to be no nearer to the patent in suit than those considered in the earlier case. The evidence as to prior use of alleged anticipating devices may be passed on at final hearing, when it is all presented in the shape of direct and cross examination. Motion for preliminary injunction granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

The patent has been sustained and construed by the court of appeals, and the devices of defendant are infringements under that construction. The prior patents which are presented here, but were not before the court of appeals, seem to be no nearer to the patent in suit than those considered in the earlier case. The evidence as to prior use of alleged anticipating devices may be passed on at final hearing, when it is all presented in the shape of direct and cross examination. Motion for preliminary injunction granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

116 F. 1022, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 5074, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parramore-v-cohn-circtsdny-1902.