Parraghi v. Pizzimenti

Michigan Court of Appeals

Parraghi v. Pizzimenti

194 N.W.2d 485, 37 Mich. App. 290, 1971 Mich. App. LEXIS 1205

CourtMichigan Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 29, 1971

DocketDocket No. 12391

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 194 N.W.2d 485 (Parraghi v. Pizzimenti) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Parraghi v. Pizzimenti, 194 N.W.2d 485, 37 Mich. App. 290, 1971 Mich. App. LEXIS 1205 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff is a member of the board of directors of the Peoples Community Hospital Authority, a public body corporate authorized by statute.¹ By a letter dated June 23, 1971, plaintiff and two other board members requested that Donald J. Pizzimenti, the chairman of the board, call a special meeting on July 15,1971, for the express purpose of electing new officers. The chairman denied the request and pointed out that the rules and regulations adopted by the board provide for the election of officers in January or February of each year.

Plaintiff sought a writ of mandamus to compel the call of a special meeting; the writ was denied. Plaintiff appeals, relying principally on the following statutory language: “The chairman shall call a meeting at any time upon written request of 3 members of the board.” MCLA 331.6; MSA 5.2456(6).

It is well settled that a trial court’s refusal to issue a writ of mandamus will only be reviewed for abuse of discretion.² We find no abuse. While it is true that the statute requires the chairman to call a meeting at the request of three board members (with no qualifications regarding the purpose behind the request), we nevertheless feel that since the request was dated one day before a regularly scheduled board meeting, and since the board holds regularly scheduled meetings each month (save July and August) the trial court acted correctly in denying the request for a writ of mandamus.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff is a member of the board of directors of the Peoples Community Hospital Authority, a public body corporate authorized by statute.¹ By a letter dated June 23, 1971, plaintiff and two other board members requested that Donald J. Pizzimenti, the chairman of the board, call a special meeting on July 15,1971, for the express purpose of electing new officers. The chairman denied the request and pointed out that the rules and regulations adopted by the board provide for the election of officers in January or February of each year.

Plaintiff sought a writ of mandamus to compel the call of a special meeting; the writ was denied. Plaintiff appeals, relying principally on the following statutory language: “The chairman shall call a meeting at any time upon written request of 3 members of the board.” MCLA 331.6; MSA 5.2456(6).

It is well settled that a trial court’s refusal to issue a writ of mandamus will only be reviewed for abuse of discretion.² We find no abuse. While it is true that the statute requires the chairman to call a meeting at the request of three board members (with no qualifications regarding the purpose behind the request), we nevertheless feel that since the request was dated one day before a regularly scheduled board meeting, and since the board holds regularly scheduled meetings each month (save July and August) the trial court acted correctly in denying the request for a writ of mandamus.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

194 N.W.2d 485, 37 Mich. App. 290, 1971 Mich. App. LEXIS 1205, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parraghi-v-pizzimenti-michctapp-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack