Parra-Rosales v. Gonzales

Ninth Circuit

Parra-Rosales v. Gonzales

188 F. App'x 599

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided July 3, 2006·No. No. 06-70204·Published

Opinions

ORDER

In compliance with this court’s April 4, 2006 order, petitioner’s counsel Manuel Murdoch has applied for admission and is now a member of the bar of this court.

Respondent’s motion to dismiss this petition for review for lack of jurisdiction is granted. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i); Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft, 327 F.3d 887, 892 (9th Cir.2003); Montero-Martinez v. Ashcroft, 277 F.3d 1137, 1144 (9th Cir.2002). The temporary stay of removal and voluntary departure confirmed by Ninth Circuit General Order 6.4(c) and Desta v. Ashcroft, 365 F.3d 741 (9th Cir.2004), shall continue in effect until issuance of the mandate.

All other pending motions are denied as moot.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

In compliance with this court’s April 4, 2006 order, petitioner’s counsel Manuel Murdoch has applied for admission and is now a member of the bar of this court.

Respondent’s motion to dismiss this petition for review for lack of jurisdiction is granted. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i); Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft, 327 F.3d 887, 892 (9th Cir.2003); Montero-Martinez v. Ashcroft, 277 F.3d 1137, 1144 (9th Cir.2002). The temporary stay of removal and voluntary departure confirmed by Ninth Circuit General Order 6.4(c) and Desta v. Ashcroft, 365 F.3d 741 (9th Cir.2004), shall continue in effect until issuance of the mandate.

All other pending motions are denied as moot.

DISMISSED.

Parra-Rosales v. Gonzales, 188 F. App'x 599 (9th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

188 F. App'x 599 (Parra-Rosales v. Gonzales) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinions

Related