Parr v. White

559 S.W.2d 344, 20 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 382, 1977 Tex. LEXIS 251
Texas Supreme Court·Decided June 22, 1977·No. No. B-6462·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The application for writ of error is refused, no reversible error. The opinion of the court of civil appeals contains a statement that may mislead litigants in the future, however. The court of civil appeals stated that an appeal from the probate court to the district court by writ of certiorari is still [345] available. 543 S.W.2d 440, 443. Although we concluded in Cluck v. Hester, 521 S.W.2d 845 (Tex.1975), that writ of certiorari review was available, the holding in that case was bottomed on the failure of the legislature to repeal section 30 of the Probate Code, which authorized such review. After Cluck v. Hester the legislature repealed section 30, thereby making writ of certiorari review by the district court no longer available in probate matters. See Tex. Probate Code Ann. § 5(e) (Supp. 1976).

POPE, J., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Parr v. White, 559 S.W.2d 344, 20 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 382, 1977 Tex. LEXIS 251 (Tex. 1977).

559 S.W.2d 344 (Parr v. White) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pollard v. Pollard
316 S.W.3d 246 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2010)
Farah v. Fashing
666 S.W.2d 341 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1984)
Novak v. Stevens
596 S.W.2d 848 (Texas Supreme Court, 1980)
Lucik v. Taylor
596 S.W.2d 514 (Texas Supreme Court, 1980)
Taylor v. Lucik
584 S.W.2d 503 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1979)