Parr v. United States

132 F. 1004, 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 5061
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon
DecidedOctober 20, 1904
DocketNo. 2,844
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 132 F. 1004 (Parr v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Parr v. United States, 132 F. 1004, 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 5061 (circtdor 1904).

Opinion

BERRINGER, District Judge.

In this case there was an allotment to Maggie Damon. John Damon was the husband of the allottee. Thereafter the Damons legally adopted Ellen Parr. Maggie Damon subsequently died, leaving, surviving her, her husband, John Damon, a son, Isaac Gober, a daughter, Rosa Gober (now Rosa Parr), and the adopted daughter, the complainant Ellen Parr. Thereafter Isaac Gober died, leaving as his only heirs said Rosa and said Ellen, the plaintiff, who claims one-half interest in the allotted lands. John Damon, the husband, is in possession, collecting all the rents and profits, to the exclusion of both Rosa and Ellen. Rosa claims to be entitled to the whole thereof.

In this case, as in the others, in order that any decree shall be effective, the United States must be made a party in the suit, and this can only be done in pursuance of the authority conferred by the act of 1894 (28 Stat. 305), as amended by that of February 6, 1901 (31 Stat. 760). There can be no proceeding of the character in question other than that provided for by the acts of Congress referred to. The jurisdiction conferred by those acts is exclusive in courts of the United States. The demurrer is overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Fairbanks
171 F. 337 (Eighth Circuit, 1909)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
132 F. 1004, 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 5061, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parr-v-united-states-circtdor-1904.