Parr v. Mound City Yellow Cab Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Parr v. Mound City Yellow Cab Co.

669 S.W.2d 291

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 17, 1984·No. No. 47879·Published

Opinion

REINHARD, Judge.

Mound City Yellow Cab appeals from a decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission that claimant, daughter of a cab driver who was killed while operating a cab, was entitled to workmen’s compensation benefits.

The critical issue, whether cabdriver was an independent contractor or an employee, is identical to the issue resolved in Shinauld v. Mound City Yellow Cab Co., 666 S.W.2d 846 (Mo.App.1984). The parties have agreed that Shinauld controls the case at bar. In Shinauld, we held that claimant was an employee and entitled to workmen’s compensation benefits. The same result follows here.

Affirmed.

KAROHL, P.J., and CRANDALL, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

REINHARD, Judge.

Mound City Yellow Cab appeals from a decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission that claimant, daughter of a cab driver who was killed while operating a cab, was entitled to workmen’s compensation benefits.

The critical issue, whether cabdriver was an independent contractor or an employee, is identical to the issue resolved in Shinauld v. Mound City Yellow Cab Co., 666 S.W.2d 846 (Mo.App.1984). The parties have agreed that Shinauld controls the case at bar. In Shinauld, we held that claimant was an employee and entitled to workmen’s compensation benefits. The same result follows here.

Affirmed.

KAROHL, P.J., and CRANDALL, J., concur.

Parr v. Mound City Yellow Cab Co., 669 S.W.2d 291 (Mo. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

669 S.W.2d 291 (Parr v. Mound City Yellow Cab Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related