Parr-Angell v. City of Northampton
This text of 170 N.E.2d 354 (Parr-Angell v. City of Northampton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Decree affirmed with costs of this appeal. The plaintiffs seek by this bill in equity to challenge the legality of proceedings whereby the defendant took by eminent domain a parcel of their land for school purposes. The judge, after finding that the taking was valid, entered a decree dismissing the bill. The plaintiffs appealed. We need not concern ourselves with the correctness of the decision below. It appeared at the argument before us that prior to the commencement of the present suit the plaintiffs brought a petition under G. L. c. 79 for the assessment of damages and that this petition has resulted in a judgment for damages in the plaintiffs’ favor. It further appeared that execution has issued on the judgment and that on August 26,1960, it was satisfied in full. In so proceeding the plaintiffs made a final and binding election of their remedy and it is not open to them -to pursue the remedy here sought. See Moore v. Sanford, 151 Mass. 285, 287. See also Pinkham v. Chelmsford, 109 Mass. 225, 228-229; Hussey v. Bryant, 95 Maine, 49.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
170 N.E.2d 354, 341 Mass. 729, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parr-angell-v-city-of-northampton-mass-1960.