Parr-Angell v. City of Northampton

170 N.E.2d 354, 341 Mass. 729
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided November 2, 1960·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Decree affirmed with costs of this appeal. The plaintiffs seek by this bill in equity to challenge the legality of proceedings whereby the defendant took by eminent domain a parcel of their land for school purposes. The judge, after finding that the taking was valid, entered a decree dismissing the bill. The plaintiffs appealed. We need not concern ourselves with the correctness of the decision below. It appeared at the argument before us that prior to the commencement of the present suit the plaintiffs brought a petition under G. L. c. 79 for the assessment of damages and that this petition has resulted in a judgment for damages in the plaintiffs’ favor. It further appeared that execution has issued on the judgment and that on August 26,1960, it was satisfied in full. In so proceeding the plaintiffs made a final and binding election of their remedy and it is not open to them -to pursue the remedy here sought. See Moore v. Sanford, 151 Mass. 285, 287. See also Pinkham v. Chelmsford, 109 Mass. 225, 228-229; Hussey v. Bryant, 95 Maine, 49.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Parr-Angell v. City of Northampton, 170 N.E.2d 354, 341 Mass. 729 (Mass. 1960).

170 N.E.2d 354 (Parr-Angell v. City of Northampton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Opinion of the Justices to the Governor
274 N.E.2d 336 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1971)