Parot v. City of Buffalo
This text of 174 A.D.2d 1034 (Parot v. City of Buffalo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Plaintiff was injured when he fell while unloading street light standards from a flatbed trailer at a lot where they were to be stored for future use throughout the City of Buffalo. The court properly dismissed his Labor Law § 240 (1) cause of action because the delivery of the street light standards was not to a construction site but was merely for stockpiling for future use (see, Cox v LaBarge Bros. Co., 154 AD2d 947, 947-948, lv dismissed 75 NY2d 808; cf., Lewis-Moors v Contel of N. Y., 167 AD2d 732; Dedario v New York Tel. Co., 162 AD2d 1001). Likewise, the court correctly dismissed plaintiff’s Labor Law § 241 (6) cause of action (see, Sprague v Picciano, 100 AD2d 247, 249-250, lv denied 62 NY2d 605). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Rath, Jr., J.—Summary Judgment.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Denman, Green, Pine and Lowery, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
174 A.D.2d 1034, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parot-v-city-of-buffalo-nyappdiv-1991.