Parone v. Rivers

84 A.D.2d 686, 446 N.Y.S.2d 641, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15811
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 30, 1981
StatusPublished
Cited by15 cases

This text of 84 A.D.2d 686 (Parone v. Rivers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Parone v. Rivers, 84 A.D.2d 686, 446 N.Y.S.2d 641, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15811 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1981).

Opinion

Judgment unanimously modified, and, as modified, affirmed, without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: Plaintiff, an attorney, brought this action for legal fees which he claimed were owed under an alleged modification of a retainer agreement with defendants who comprise the Town Board óf the Town of Niagara. Defendants counterclaimed to recover alleged overpayment. After a nonjury trial, judgment was awarded to defendants on their counterclaim and plaintiff appealed. In reviewing findings of fact in a nonjury trial, the record should be viewed in a light most favorable to sustain the judgment, due deference should be accorded Trial Term in matters of credibility and the findings of fact should not.be disturbed unless such determination could not have been reached under any fair interpretation of the facts (Matter of Dearmyer v Clark, 71 AD2d 807, 808; Tomaino v Tomaino, 68 AD2d 267). Plaintiff’s action was properly dismissed. There was insufficient proof of an oral modification but even if there had been, such agreement could not bind the town. A town’s contractual obligations can be created only in the manner provided by statute (Town Law, § 64, subd 6; New York Tel. Co. v Town of North Hempstead, 41 NY2d 691, 695-696; 10 McQuillin, Municipal Corporations, §§ 29.106-29.107). The proof established that defendants are entitled to judgment on the counterclaim; however, the amount of the award should be $241.47, plus costs and disbursements. That figure represents the $32,778 received by plaintiff, from which is subtracted $22,031 (plaintiff’s annual retainer and the disbursements and lawsuit work for the period January-September, 1977); $6,946.53 (the portion of retainer for town work and the disbursements and lawsuit for both sewer and town for the period October-December, 1977); $784 (disbursements for title abstract); and $2,775 (town work retainer and quantum meruit for sewer work for January 1, 1978). [687]*687(Appeal from judgment of Niagara Supreme Court, Wolf, J. — fee for legal services.) Present — Simons, J. P., Hancock, Jr., Doerr, Denman and Moule, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

DRYDEN MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. GOESSL, STANLEY
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014
Dryden Mutual Insurance v. Goessl
117 A.D.3d 1512 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
A&M GLOBAL MANAGEMENT CORP. v. NORTHTOWN UROLOGY ASSOCIATES, P.C.
115 A.D.3d 1283 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
TOWN OF ANGELICA v. SMITH, JOEL S.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011
Town of Angelica v. Smith
89 A.D.3d 1547 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
In re City of Syracuse Industrial Development Agency
20 A.D.3d 168 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Clark v. County of Nassau
12 A.D.3d 633 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Farrell v. Cayuga County Board of Elections
288 A.D.2d 844 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Verifacts Group, Inc. v. Town of Babylon
267 A.D.2d 379 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Miner v. Kimble
168 A.D.2d 887 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
Goldberg v. Penny
163 A.D.2d 352 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
Boggs v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.
132 A.D.2d 340 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
City University of New York v. Finalco, Inc.
129 A.D.2d 494 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
Merrill Transport Co. v. State
97 A.D.2d 921 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
84 A.D.2d 686, 446 N.Y.S.2d 641, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15811, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parone-v-rivers-nyappdiv-1981.