Paro v. Weeks

24 A.D.2d 1054, 265 N.Y.S.2d 625, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2671

This text of 24 A.D.2d 1054 (Paro v. Weeks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Paro v. Weeks, 24 A.D.2d 1054, 265 N.Y.S.2d 625, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2671 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1965).

Opinion

Memorandum by the Court.

Although admitting acts of intercourse with complainant, appellant denied that any occurred during the period when conception took place. The testimony of the complainant and the corroborative evidence adduced from her witnesses conflicted sharply with the testimony of appellant and his alibi witnesses. In these circumstances we must attach especial weight to the trial court’s superior opportunity to evaluate the credibility of the evidence and we find no compelling reason to disturb its conclusions. Order of filiation affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Taylor and Aulisi, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
24 A.D.2d 1054, 265 N.Y.S.2d 625, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2671, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paro-v-weeks-nyappdiv-1965.