Parnham v. Parnham

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Parnham v. Parnham

234 A.D. 895

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 15, 1931

StatusPublished

This text of 234 A.D. 895 (Parnham v. Parnham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Parnham v. Parnham, 234 A.D. 895 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

Order modifying judgment affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Hagarty, Carswell, Scudder and Davis, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., dissents and votes to modify the order by striking from the 8th line of the decretal paragraph thereof the words “ January 1st,” and by inserting in place thereof the words “ March 16,” and to affirm as so modified, being of opinion that the reduction of alimony should begin as of March 16, 1931, the return day of the motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order modifying judgment affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Hagarty, Carswell, Scudder and Davis, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., dissents and votes to modify the order by striking from the 8th line of the decretal paragraph thereof the words “ January 1st,” and by inserting in place thereof the words “ March 16,” and to affirm as so modified, being of opinion that the reduction of alimony should begin as of March 16, 1931, the return day of the motion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

234 A.D. 895, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parnham-v-parnham-nyappdiv-1931.