Parnes v. Willner
This text of 453 So. 2d 1148 (Parnes v. Willner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appellants have conceded that there is no record of their having challenged below the authority of their attorney to enter into the settlement agreement, and this challenge, having been made for the first time in their reply brief, is not preserved for review. The record does reflect that the only challenge made below to the agreement, and indeed the only challenge made in their initial brief, was that the written communication sent by appellants’ attorney did not constitute an offer of settlement which was capable of being accepted. The trial court correctly ruled that the latter challenge was without merit.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
453 So. 2d 1148, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14174, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parnes-v-willner-fladistctapp-1984.