Parnell v. Tyner
This text of Parnell v. Tyner (Parnell v. Tyner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION JAY PARNELL PLAINTIFF
v. CASE NO. 3:20-CV-00395-BSM MICHAEL TYNER, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER Jay Parnell’s motion for leave to file an amended complaint [Doc. No. 8] is granted. Defendants’ motion to dismiss [Doc. No. 3] is denied as moot. See Pure Country, Inc. v. Sigma Chi Frat., 312 F.3d 952, 956 (8th Cir. 2002) (amended complaint renders moot a motion to dismiss the original complaint). IT IS SO ORDERED this 7th day of January, 2021. Biron 2 rn UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Parnell v. Tyner, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parnell-v-tyner-ared-2021.