Parnell v. Tyner

District Court, E.D. Arkansas·Decided January 7, 2021·No. 3:20-cv-00395·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION JAY PARNELL PLAINTIFF

v. CASE NO. 3:20-CV-00395-BSM MICHAEL TYNER, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER Jay Parnell’s motion for leave to file an amended complaint [Doc. No. 8] is granted. Defendants’ motion to dismiss [Doc. No. 3] is denied as moot. See Pure Country, Inc. v. Sigma Chi Frat., 312 F.3d 952, 956 (8th Cir. 2002) (amended complaint renders moot a motion to dismiss the original complaint). IT IS SO ORDERED this 7th day of January, 2021. Biron 2 rn UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Parnell v. Tyner, (E.D. Ark. 2021).

Parnell v. Tyner (Parnell v. Tyner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related