Parnell v. State

278 S.W.2d 850
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 20, 1955
DocketNo. 27553
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 278 S.W.2d 850 (Parnell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Parnell v. State, 278 S.W.2d 850 (Tex. 1955).

Opinion

MORRISON, Presiding Judge.

The offense is aggravated assault; the punishment, six months.

No statement of facts accompanies the record.

Bill of exception No. 1, the only one briefed by appellant, seeks to raise the question of the competency of the affiant who signed the complaint against the appellant on the grounds that the affiant did not witness the assault and gained his knowledge thereof from talking to the injured party. Section 2 of Article 222, V.A.C.C.P., provides that a complaint may be made upon information and belief and disposes of the question raised in the brief.

Finding no reversible error, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ealy v. State
319 S.W.2d 710 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1958)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
278 S.W.2d 850, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parnell-v-state-texcrimapp-1955.