Parnell v. State

101 So. 925, 20 Ala. App. 691
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedNovember 18, 1924
Docket4 Div. 4.
StatusPublished

This text of 101 So. 925 (Parnell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Parnell v. State, 101 So. 925, 20 Ala. App. 691 (Ala. Ct. App. 1924).

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

There is no bill of exceptions in this case; the appeal as submitted here being upon the record proper. The record appears regular in all respects, and shows that this appellant, defendant in the court below, was indicted, tried, and convicted upon the charge that he did distill, make, or manufacture alcoholic, spirituous, malted, or mixed liquors or beverages a part of which was alcohol, contrary to law. Judgment was entered accordingly; the defendant being sentenced to serve an indeterminate term of imprisonment in the penitentiary for not less than one year and six months nor more than one year and seven months. No error being apparent on the record, the judgment of conviction appealed from is affirmed. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
101 So. 925, 20 Ala. App. 691, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parnell-v-state-alactapp-1924.