Parnell v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance

139 S.E.2d 723, 263 N.C. 445, 1965 N.C. LEXIS 1301
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJanuary 15, 1965
Docket463
StatusPublished
Cited by26 cases

This text of 139 S.E.2d 723 (Parnell v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Parnell v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance, 139 S.E.2d 723, 263 N.C. 445, 1965 N.C. LEXIS 1301 (N.C. 1965).

Opinion

Bobbitt, J.

Plaintiff’s motion to strike is addressed to defendant’s further answer and defense in its entirety and in substance, if not in form, is a demurrer. The court, in allowing plaintiff’s motion to strike, in effect sustained a demurrer to defendant’s further answer and defense. Jewell v. Price, 259 N.C. 345, 348, 130 S.E. 2d 668, and cases cited.

In considering plaintiff’s motion to strike (demurrer), the facts alleged by defendant are deemed admitted. Jenkins & Co. v. Lewis, 259 N.C. 86, 88, 130 S.E. 2d 49; Pack v. McCoy, 251 N.C. 590, 112 S.E. 2d 118; Trust Co. v. Currin, 244 N.C. 102, 92 S.E. 2d 658.

“Every action must be prosecuted in the name of the real party in interest . . .” G.S. 1-57; Morton v. Thornton, 257 N.C. 259, 262, 125 S.E. 2d 464, and cases cited. An agent is not the real party in interest and cannot maintain an action. Morton v. Thornton, 259 N.C. 697, 700, 131 S.E. 2d 378.

“A real party in interest is a party who is benefited or injured by the judgment in the case. An interest which warrants making a person *449 a party is not an interest in the action involved merely, but some interest in the subject matter of the litigation.” Rental Co. v. Justice, 211 N.C. 54, 188 S.E. 609.

As pertinent to whether plaintiff is a real party in interest, reference is made to Herring v. Jackson, 255 N.C. 537, 543, 122 S.E. 2d 366, and cases cited.

The facts alleged by defendant disclose that Safeco Insurance Company, in discharge of its obligations under the liability policy it issued to plaintiff, paid in full the judgment Phillips obtained against plaintiff; that this action is being prosecuted in the name of plaintiff by Safeco and solely for its benefit; and that plaintiff has made no payment or otherwise suffered loss for which he has a claim against defendant. If the facts are as alleged by defendant, plaintiff is not the real party in interest in respect of an existing cause of action, if any, against defendant on account of matters alleged in the complaint.

Whether Safeco has a cause of action against defendant is not presented by this appeal.

The order, which in effect sustains plaintiff’s demurrer to defendant’s further answer and defense, is reversed.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Menendez
813 S.E.2d 680 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2018)
In re the Foreclosure of a Deed of Trust Executed by Webb
751 S.E.2d 636 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2013)
Ls Mtron v. Escorts, Ltd.
2012 NCBC 18 (North Carolina Business Court, 2012)
Woolard v. Davenport
601 S.E.2d 319 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2004)
Daniel v. Wray
580 S.E.2d 711 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2003)
Land v. TALL HOUSE BUILDING CO.
563 S.E.2d 8 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2002)
In Re the Estate of Anderson
559 S.E.2d 222 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2002)
Sterling v. Gil Soucy Trucking, Ltd.
552 S.E.2d 674 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2001)
Whittaker v. Furniture Factory Outlet Shops & Auto-Owners Insurance
550 S.E.2d 822 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2001)
Hansen v. Crystal Ford-Mercury, Inc.
531 S.E.2d 867 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2000)
Energy Investors Fund, L.P. v. Metric Constructors, Inc.
525 S.E.2d 441 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2000)
Kane Plaza Associates v. Chadwick
486 S.E.2d 465 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1997)
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Scott
476 S.E.2d 404 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1996)
Goodrich v. Rice
331 S.E.2d 195 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1985)
Carolina First National Bank v. Douglas Gallery of Homes, Ltd.
314 S.E.2d 801 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1984)
Carawan v. Tate
286 S.E.2d 99 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1982)
Carawan v. Tate
280 S.E.2d 528 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1981)
Booker v. Everhart
240 S.E.2d 360 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
139 S.E.2d 723, 263 N.C. 445, 1965 N.C. LEXIS 1301, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parnell-v-nationwide-mutual-insurance-nc-1965.