Parnell Ex Rel. Sedberry v. Wilson
This text of 114 S.E.2d 114 (Parnell Ex Rel. Sedberry v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
There was evidence supporting the allegations of joint and concurrent negligence proximately causing plaintiff’s injuries. The weight of the evidence was for the jury. The exceptions of defendant Bull to the exclusion of evidence and the rulings of the court with reference to arguments of counsel are not sustained. If erroneous in any respect, they were not sufficiently prejudicial to warrant a new trial. The charge of the court, when considered contextually, adequately presented the law applicable to the factual situations disclosed by the evidence. The burden is on the defendants to show prejudicial error. Taylor Co. v. Highway Commission, 250 N.C. 533, 539, 109 S.E. 2d 243.
In the trial below we find No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
114 S.E.2d 114, 252 N.C. 486, 1960 N.C. LEXIS 603, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parnell-ex-rel-sedberry-v-wilson-nc-1960.