Parnell Ex Rel. Sedberry v. Wilson
Opinion
There was evidence supporting the allegations of joint and concurrent negligence proximately causing plaintiff’s injuries. The weight of the evidence was for the jury. The exceptions of defendant Bull to the exclusion of evidence and the rulings of the court with reference to arguments of counsel are not sustained. If erroneous in any respect, they were not sufficiently prejudicial to warrant a new trial. The charge of the court, when considered contextually, adequately presented the law applicable to the factual situations disclosed by the evidence. The burden is on the defendants to show prejudicial error. Taylor Co. v. Highway Commission, 250 N.C. 533, 539, 109 S.E. 2d 243.
In the trial below we find No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
114 S.E.2d 114 (Parnell Ex Rel. Sedberry v. Wilson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.