Parnak v. Grosso

184 A. 734, 120 N.J. Eq. 338, 1936 N.J. LEXIS 705
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided May 18, 1936·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is an appeal from a decree which set aside a sale held by virtue of a judgment, and also a chattel mortgage foreclosure sale, and provided that certain goods and chattels in the possession of defendants by reason of said sale, be returned forthwith to the complainants.

We have examined the proofs, and concur in the conclusions arrived at by the court of chancery, and the decree will therefore be affirmed.

*339 For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Bodine, Hehbr, Perskie, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, JJ. 9.

For reversal — Lloyd, Case, Donges, JJ. 3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Parnak v. Grosso, 184 A. 734, 120 N.J. Eq. 338, 1936 N.J. LEXIS 705 (N.J. 1936).

184 A. 734 (Parnak v. Grosso) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.