Parmelee v. United States

Court of Claims

Parmelee v. United States

56 Ct. Cl. 125, 1921 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 182, 1921 WL 1242

United States Court of Claims·Decided February 21, 1921·No. No. 34695·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.

The item upon which judgment is rendered is, in the-opinion of the court, governed by the cases of Katzer, 52 C. Cls., 32, and Knowles, 52 C. Cls., 520. As to the other item-claimed, it appears that the plaintiff was informed that if he-did not desire to proceed to Norfolk, Va., at his own expense he should regard the orders as revoked and return them to the bureau for cancellation. This evidently was not an order such as was discussed in the Katzer case, supra, and does not. justify an extension of the rule therein stated.

Judgment will be entered for plaintiff in the sum of $253.68.

The petition as to the other item is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.

The item upon which judgment is rendered is, in the-opinion of the court, governed by the cases of Katzer, 52 C. Cls., 32, and Knowles, 52 C. Cls., 520. As to the other item-claimed, it appears that the plaintiff was informed that if he-did not desire to proceed to Norfolk, Va., at his own expense he should regard the orders as revoked and return them to the bureau for cancellation. This evidently was not an order such as was discussed in the Katzer case, supra, and does not. justify an extension of the rule therein stated.

Judgment will be entered for plaintiff in the sum of $253.68.

The petition as to the other item is dismissed.

Parmelee v. United States, 56 Ct. Cl. 125, 1921 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 182, 1921 WL 1242 (cc 1921).

Pincite

56 Ct. Cl. 125 (Parmelee v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related