Parlin & Orendorff Co. v. Angell
This text of 74 N.W. 777 (Parlin & Orendorff Co. v. Angell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The sole question presented is whether the* trial court erred in refusing to set aside the verdict of the jury as not warranted by the evidence. The rule that the determination of the trial court on such a question cannot be disturbed on appeal, if there is any credible evidence, to support the finding of the jury, is too familiar to justify a discussion of it at this time. Testing the verdict by the. record; in the light of such rule, we are unable to discover any warrant for a reversal of the judgment.
By the Court.— The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
74 N.W. 777, 99 Wis. 297, 1898 Wisc. LEXIS 27, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parlin-orendorff-co-v-angell-wis-1898.