Parlin & Orendorff Co. v. Angell

74 N.W. 777, 99 Wis. 297, 1898 Wisc. LEXIS 27
Wisconsin Supreme Court·Decided April 12, 1898·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Marshall, J.

The sole question presented is whether the* trial court erred in refusing to set aside the verdict of the jury as not warranted by the evidence. The rule that the determination of the trial court on such a question cannot be disturbed on appeal, if there is any credible evidence, to support the finding of the jury, is too familiar to justify a discussion of it at this time. Testing the verdict by the. record; in the light of such rule, we are unable to discover any warrant for a reversal of the judgment.

By the Court.— The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Parlin & Orendorff Co. v. Angell, 74 N.W. 777, 99 Wis. 297, 1898 Wisc. LEXIS 27 (Wis. 1898).

74 N.W. 777 (Parlin & Orendorff Co. v. Angell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Collins v. City of Janesville
94 N.W. 309 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1903)