Parliament Ins. Co. v. That Girl in Miami, Inc.
Opinion
PARLIAMENT INSURANCE COMPANY, a Foreign Corporation, Appellant,
v.
THAT GIRL IN MIAMI, INC., a Florida Corporation, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Jesse W. Miller, North Miami, for appellant.
Stabinski, Funt, Levine & Vega and Regina F. Zelonker, Miami, for appellee.
Before HENDRY, BARKDULL and SCHWARTZ, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
After an insurance company was sued by its insured, immediately prior to trial it made an offer of judgment pursuant to Rule 1.442, R.C.P., which was accepted and a judgment was entered in accordance with the offer. The insured then moved for and received attorney's fees pursuant to Section 627.428, Florida Statutes (1975), and the company appealed contending that because of the offer for judgment it had no liability for attorney's fees. We disagree.
The effect of the judgment was res adjudicata on the issues. Hay v. Sailsbury, 92 Fla. 446, 109 So. 617 (1926). If an insurance company wants to make an offer of settlement which includes attorney's fees, it should do so. In this connection, see: Hernandez v. Travelers Insurance Company, 331 So.2d 329 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976). In the instant case the insured recovered a judgment against his insurer on a policy. Therefore, pursuant to the terms of Section 627.428(1), Florida Statutes (1975), it is provided that in such instance the insured is entitled to attorney's fees.
The order under review is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
377 So. 2d 1011 (Parliament Ins. Co. v. That Girl in Miami, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.