Parliament Ins. Co. v. That Girl in Miami, Inc.

377 So. 2d 1011
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 18, 1979
Docket79-763
StatusPublished
Cited by13 cases

This text of 377 So. 2d 1011 (Parliament Ins. Co. v. That Girl in Miami, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Parliament Ins. Co. v. That Girl in Miami, Inc., 377 So. 2d 1011 (Fla. Ct. App. 1979).

Opinion

377 So.2d 1011 (1979)

PARLIAMENT INSURANCE COMPANY, a Foreign Corporation, Appellant,
v.
THAT GIRL IN MIAMI, INC., a Florida Corporation, Appellee.

No. 79-763.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

December 18, 1979.

Jesse W. Miller, North Miami, for appellant.

Stabinski, Funt, Levine & Vega and Regina F. Zelonker, Miami, for appellee.

Before HENDRY, BARKDULL and SCHWARTZ, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

After an insurance company was sued by its insured, immediately prior to trial it made an offer of judgment pursuant to Rule 1.442, R.C.P., which was accepted and a judgment was entered in accordance with the offer. The insured then moved for and received attorney's fees pursuant to Section 627.428, Florida Statutes (1975), and the company appealed contending that because of the offer for judgment it had no liability for attorney's fees. We disagree.

The effect of the judgment was res adjudicata on the issues. Hay v. Sailsbury, 92 Fla. 446, 109 So. 617 (1926). If an insurance company wants to make an offer of settlement which includes attorney's fees, it should do so. In this connection, see: Hernandez v. Travelers Insurance Company, 331 So.2d 329 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976). In the instant case the insured recovered a judgment against his insurer on a policy. Therefore, pursuant to the terms of Section 627.428(1), Florida Statutes (1975), it is provided that in such instance the insured is entitled to attorney's fees.

The order under review is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Williams v. Brochu
578 So. 2d 491 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Jordan v. National Grange Mutual Insurance
393 S.E.2d 647 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1990)
Unicare Health Facilities, Inc. v. Mort
553 So. 2d 159 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1989)
Mort v. Unicare Health Facilities, Inc.
537 So. 2d 203 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Godbey v. Walsh
530 So. 2d 343 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Ahmed v. Lane Pontiac-Buick, Inc.
527 So. 2d 930 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
McDermott v. City of Clearwater
526 So. 2d 121 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Seminole Colony, Inc. v. Stanko
501 So. 2d 195 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Ramos v. Ayala
16 Fla. Supp. 2d 114 (Florida Circuit Courts, 1985)
River Road Constr. Co. v. Ring Power Corp.
454 So. 2d 38 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Encompass Inc. v. Alford
444 So. 2d 1085 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Frank v. Engel Van Lines, Inc.
429 So. 2d 333 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
WIMBLEDON TOWNHOUSE CONDO. 1 ASS'N, INC. v. Kessler
425 So. 2d 29 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
377 So. 2d 1011, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parliament-ins-co-v-that-girl-in-miami-inc-fladistctapp-1979.