Parliament House Properties v. Georgia Power Company

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Parliament House Properties v. Georgia Power Company

DecidedJuly 23, 2015

DocketA15A0041

StatusPublished

This text of Parliament House Properties v. Georgia Power Company (Parliament House Properties v. Georgia Power Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Parliament House Properties v. Georgia Power Company, (Ga. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ July 13, 2015

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A15A0041. PARLIAMENT HOUSE PROPERTIES et al. v. GEORGIA POWER COMPANY.

Georgia Power Company sought an order enjoining Parliament House Properties, Inc., Jimmy Key Camper Park, James R. Key, and Tim F. Steedley (collectively “Parliament House”) from encroaching and trespassing on Georgia Power’s easement/right of way across Parliament House’s property. In a final order, the trial court found that Parliament House violated the express terms of the easements, and granted Georgia Power’s request for permanent injunctive relief. Parliament House appeals from the grant of this injunction. We, however, lack jurisdiction. The Georgia Constitution grants the Supreme Court general appellate jurisdiction over “all equity cases.” Ga. Const. of 1983, Art. VI , Sec. VI, Par. III (2). “‘Equity cases’ are those in which a substantive issue on appeal involves the legality or propriety of equitable relief sought in the superior court – whether that relief was granted or denied.” Beauchamp v. Knight, 261 Ga. 608, 609 (2) (409 SE2d 208) (1991). “Injunction is distinctly an equitable remedy[.]” (Citation omitted.) Knott v. Evans, 280 Ga. 515, 516 (2) (630 SE2d 402) (2006). Because the main issue on appeal is the propriety of the trial court’s grant of equitable relief to Georgia Power, this is an “equity case” within the Supreme Court’s jurisdiction. Moreover, it is well-settled that the ultimate responsibility for determining appellate jurisdiction is vested in the Supreme Court of Georgia. See Saxton v. Coastal Dialysis &c., 267 Ga. 177, 178 (476 SE2d 587) (1996). Accordingly, this case is hereby TRANSFERRED to the Supreme Court of Georgia. If the Supreme Court ultimately decides that it lacks jurisdiction, we will decide this case expeditiously upon its return to this Court. Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia 07/13/2015 Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ July 13, 2015

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A15A0041. PARLIAMENT HOUSE PROPERTIES et al. v. GEORGIA POWER COMPANY.

Georgia Power Company sought an order enjoining Parliament House Properties, Inc., Jimmy Key Camper Park, James R. Key, and Tim F. Steedley (collectively “Parliament House”) from encroaching and trespassing on Georgia Power’s easement/right of way across Parliament House’s property. In a final order, the trial court found that Parliament House violated the express terms of the easements, and granted Georgia Power’s request for permanent injunctive relief. Parliament House appeals from the grant of this injunction. We, however, lack jurisdiction. The Georgia Constitution grants the Supreme Court general appellate jurisdiction over “all equity cases.” Ga. Const. of 1983, Art. VI , Sec. VI, Par. III (2). “‘Equity cases’ are those in which a substantive issue on appeal involves the legality or propriety of equitable relief sought in the superior court – whether that relief was granted or denied.” Beauchamp v. Knight, 261 Ga. 608, 609 (2) (409 SE2d 208) (1991). “Injunction is distinctly an equitable remedy[.]” (Citation omitted.) Knott v. Evans, 280 Ga. 515, 516 (2) (630 SE2d 402) (2006). Because the main issue on appeal is the propriety of the trial court’s grant of equitable relief to Georgia Power, this is an “equity case” within the Supreme Court’s jurisdiction. Moreover, it is well-settled that the ultimate responsibility for determining appellate jurisdiction is vested in the Supreme Court of Georgia. See Saxton v. Coastal Dialysis &c., 267 Ga. 177, 178 (476 SE2d 587) (1996). Accordingly, this case is hereby TRANSFERRED to the Supreme Court of Georgia. If the Supreme Court ultimately decides that it lacks jurisdiction, we will decide this case expeditiously upon its return to this Court. Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia 07/13/2015 Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Parliament House Properties v. Georgia Power Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parliament-house-properties-v-georgia-power-compan-gactapp-2015.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack