PARLEE v. State

952 So. 2d 1246, 2007 WL 1012859
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 5, 2007·No. 5D06-4271·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

952 So.2d 1246 (2007)

Ronald PARLEE, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 5D06-4271.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

April 5, 2007.

Ronald E. Parlee, Malone, pro se.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Carlos A. Ivanor, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The lower court's order, which summarily denied Appellant's Rule 3.850 motion, is reversed and this cause is remanded with directions that the trial court either grant an evidentiary hearing on Appellant's claims or attach portions of the record that conclusively refute each of Appellant's *1247 claims. McLin v. State, 827 So.2d 948, 954 (Fla.2002).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

GRIFFIN, SAWAYA and TORPY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PARLEE v. State, 952 So. 2d 1246, 2007 WL 1012859 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

952 So. 2d 1246 (PARLEE v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Huff v. State
952 So. 2d 1246 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)