PARLEE v. State
This text of 952 So. 2d 1246 (PARLEE v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Ronald PARLEE, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Ronald E. Parlee, Malone, pro se.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Carlos A. Ivanor, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The lower court's order, which summarily denied Appellant's Rule 3.850 motion, is reversed and this cause is remanded with directions that the trial court either grant an evidentiary hearing on Appellant's claims or attach portions of the record that conclusively refute each of Appellant's *1247 claims. McLin v. State, 827 So.2d 948, 954 (Fla.2002).
REVERSED and REMANDED.
GRIFFIN, SAWAYA and TORPY, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
952 So. 2d 1246, 2007 WL 1012859, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parlee-v-state-fladistctapp-2007.