Parlato v. Thomas

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Parlato v. Thomas

123 N.Y.S. 373

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedMay 15, 1910

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 123 N.Y.S. 373 (Parlato v. Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Parlato v. Thomas, 123 N.Y.S. 373 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1910).

Pincite

Opinion

SEABURY, J.

The plaintiff sues to recover the value of a horse, which he delivered to the defendant upon the understanding that the defendant was to keep it in his stable for $5 per month. Under the agreement the plaintiff was to feed the horse. The horse was stolen. The relation existing between the plaintiff and the defendant was that of bailor and bailee for mutual benefit. The defendant’s duty as bailee merely required him to exercise ordinary care, and .he was not liable for the loss of the horse, in the absence of proof that the loss was occasioned by his negligence or wrongful act. Stewart v. Stone, 127 N. Y. 500, 506, 28 N. E. 595, 14 L. R. A. 215; Cramer v. Klein, 127 App. Div. 146, 111 N. Y. Supp. 469.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SEABURY, J.

The plaintiff sues to recover the value of a horse, which he delivered to the defendant upon the understanding that the defendant was to keep it in his stable for $5 per month. Under the agreement the plaintiff was to feed the horse. The horse was stolen. The relation existing between the plaintiff and the defendant was that of bailor and bailee for mutual benefit. The defendant’s duty as bailee merely required him to exercise ordinary care, and .he was not liable for the loss of the horse, in the absence of proof that the loss was occasioned by his negligence or wrongful act. Stewart v. Stone, 127 N. Y. 500, 506, 28 N. E. 595, 14 L. R. A. 215; Cramer v. Klein, 127 App. Div. 146, 111 N. Y. Supp. 469.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

123 N.Y.S. 373, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parlato-v-thomas-nyappterm-1910.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack