Parlaman v. Parlaman
2 N.J.L. 270
This text of 2 N.J.L. 270 (Parlaman v. Parlaman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Parlaman v. Parlaman, 2 N.J.L. 270 (N.J. 1807).
Opinion
— The peaceable and quiet possession of, the plaintiff below, was part of the issue; her acknowledgment or declarations on that subject was evidence proper to go to the jury, and ought not to have been rejected. Therefore, judgment must be reversed.
Cited in Gregory v. Kanouse, 6 Halst. 62; Hill v. Carter, 1 Harr. 87.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
2 N.J.L. 270, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parlaman-v-parlaman-nj-1807.