Home/Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York/Parkside Development Co. v. McGee

Parkside Development Co. v. McGee

21 Misc. 2d 277, 193 N.Y.S.2d 910, 1959 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2367
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedDecember 17, 1959
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 21 Misc. 2d 277 (Parkside Development Co. v. McGee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Parkside Development Co. v. McGee, 21 Misc. 2d 277, 193 N.Y.S.2d 910, 1959 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2367 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Since the occupancy agreement between the co-operative housing corporation and tenant created a landlord and tenant relationship, the landlord was required to prove a substantial violation in order to obtain a final order of eviction against tenant. The mere keeping of a dog in an apartment in contravention of the terms of a lease is not a breach of a substantial obligation of the tenancy (Hardav Realty Corp. v. Donahue, 8 Misc 2d 951; Smith Real Estate v. Byrne, 3 Misc 2d 559). There is no claim or proof here that the parties agreed that the violation in the lease at issue was to be considered a violation of a substantial obligation of tenancy. (L. H. Estates Co. v. Bartholomew, 9 Misc 2d 116, affd. 5 A D 2d 815.) Nor is there any claim or proof that the tenant committed or permitted a nuisance in the housing accommodations or that her conduct was such as to interfere substantially with the comfort or safety of the landlord or of other tenants.

The final order should be reversed, with $30 costs, and final order directed in favor of tenant, with costs.

Concur — Steuer, J. P., Aurelio and Tilzer, JJ.

Final order reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

930 Fifth Corp. v. King
71 Misc. 2d 359 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1972)
Jefferson Associates v. Miller
63 Misc. 2d 1056 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1970)
Triangle Management Corp. v. Inniss
62 Misc. 2d 1095 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1970)
Latham Improvements, Inc. v. Brenner
52 Misc. 2d 793 (Colonie Justice Court, 1967)
Madison 52nd Corp. v. Ogust
49 Misc. 2d 663 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1966)
Fanchild Investors, Inc. v. Cohen
43 Misc. 2d 39 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1964)
Mutual ReDevelopment Houses, Inc. v. Hanft
42 Misc. 2d 1044 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1964)
Hilltop Village Cooperative 4, Inc. v. Goldstein
41 Misc. 2d 402 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1963)
Jerome Realty Co. v. Yankovich
35 Misc. 2d 183 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1962)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
21 Misc. 2d 277, 193 N.Y.S.2d 910, 1959 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2367, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parkside-development-co-v-mcgee-nyappterm-1959.