Parks v. Western

Appellate Court of Illinois

Parks v. Western

193 Ill. App. 284

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedMarch 9, 1915

DocketGen. No. 6,046

StatusPublished

This text of 193 Ill. App. 284 (Parks v. Western) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Parks v. Western, 193 Ill. App. 284 (Ill. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Dibell

delivered the opinion of the court.

5. Bills and notes, § 462*—when instruction as to liability of maker not erroneous. An instruction in an action on a note, to the effect that if the jury believed from the evidence that it was executed by the maker, delivered to the payee and had not been paid, that they should find for the plaintiff in such amount, if any, as from the evidence they found to be due, held not erroneous. 6. Trial, § 34*—when presence on bench of judge formerly of counsel not prejudicial. The fact that a judge of a Circuit Court, who was formerly of counsel for the plaintiff, came into the court room during the trial, went upon the bench and spoke to the presiding judge, held not prejudicial to the defendant where neither the length of such conversation nor the subject thereof appeared.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Dibell

delivered the opinion of the court.

5. Bills and notes, § 462*—when instruction as to liability of maker not erroneous. An instruction in an action on a note, to the effect that if the jury believed from the evidence that it was executed by the maker, delivered to the payee and had not been paid, that they should find for the plaintiff in such amount, if any, as from the evidence they found to be due, held not erroneous. 6. Trial, § 34*—when presence on bench of judge formerly of counsel not prejudicial. The fact that a judge of a Circuit Court, who was formerly of counsel for the plaintiff, came into the court room during the trial, went upon the bench and spoke to the presiding judge, held not prejudicial to the defendant where neither the length of such conversation nor the subject thereof appeared.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

193 Ill. App. 284, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parks-v-western-illappct-1915.