Parks v. United States Bankers' Corp.

140 F. 160, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 4779
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York·Decided July 10, 1905·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

This is a controversy between stockholders of a Maine corporation. The owners of 2,982 shares unite in prayer for appointment of receiver, the owners of 3,360 shares oppose the application. No creditor appears. On the contrary, there seem to be no creditors, while the assets are concededly about $20,000. There has been no judgment entered, nor execution returned unsatisfied, no receivers appointed in the home state, nothing to indicate insolvency, or the necessity of protecting the assets for the benefit of creditors. There is no reason why the parties should not take their controversy to the state of Maine, which created the corporation, and which alone has power to dissolve it. When receivers are there appointed, this court will appoint ancillary receivers to conserve any property which may be here; but as the case now stands, there is no reason certainly why this court should appoint a temporary receiver, nor interfere with the management of the internal affairs of this foreign corporation.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Parks v. United States Bankers' Corp., 140 F. 160, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 4779 (circtsdny 1905).

140 F. 160 (Parks v. United States Bankers' Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Williamson v. Missouri-Kansas Pipe Line Co.
56 F.2d 503 (Seventh Circuit, 1932)
Burnrite Coal Briquette Co. v. Riggs
274 U.S. 208 (Supreme Court, 1927)
Fehr v. Black Petroleum Corporation
1924 OK 903 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1924)
Ward v. Foulkrod
264 F. 627 (Third Circuit, 1920)
Maguire v. Mortgage Co. of America
203 F. 858 (Second Circuit, 1913)