Parks v. State
719 So. 2d 1212, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11321, 1998 WL 559340
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 4, 1998·No. No. 97-2618·Published·Cited by 5 cases
Opinion
Admittedly appellee has raised serious errors that may have occurred at his sentencing below. These errors, however, were not raised below and were not preserved for appeal. See Maddox v. State, 708 So.2d 617 (Fla. 5th DCA), rev. granted, 718 So.2d 169 (Fla.1998).
Although we affirm the sentence below, we acknowledge conflict with Harriel v. State, 710 So.2d 102 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998) and Denson v. State, 711 So.2d 1225 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Parks v. State, 719 So. 2d 1212, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11321, 1998 WL 559340 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).
719 So. 2d 1212 (Parks v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Parks v. State
765 So. 2d 35 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)
Maddox v. State
760 So. 2d 89 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)
State v. Jefferson
758 So. 2d 661 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)
Nordheim v. Dept. of Env. Protection
719 So. 2d 1212 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)