Parks v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Parks v. State

676 So. 2d 27, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6330, 1996 WL 325119

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 13, 1996·No. No. 95-410·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this direct criminal appeal, the public defender has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Appellant has also filed a brief in proper person. Having carefully reviewed the entire record and considered the issues raised by appellant, we agree that no reversible error occurred. Accordingly, we affirm appellant’s convictions and sentences. However, we remand with directions that the costs imposed as to count two be stricken. Hunter v. State, 651 So.2d 1258 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995).

AFFIRMED and REMANDED, with directions.

WEBSTER, MICKLE and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In this direct criminal appeal, the public defender has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Appellant has also filed a brief in proper person. Having carefully reviewed the entire record and considered the issues raised by appellant, we agree that no reversible error occurred. Accordingly, we affirm appellant’s convictions and sentences. However, we remand with directions that the costs imposed as to count two be stricken. Hunter v. State, 651 So.2d 1258 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995).

AFFIRMED and REMANDED, with directions.

WEBSTER, MICKLE and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur.

Parks v. State, 676 So. 2d 27, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6330, 1996 WL 325119 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

676 So. 2d 27 (Parks v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related