Parks v. State
This text of 676 So. 2d 27 (Parks v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this direct criminal appeal, the public defender has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Appellant has also filed a brief in proper person. Having carefully reviewed the entire record and considered the issues raised by appellant, we agree that no reversible error occurred. Accordingly, we affirm appellant’s convictions and sentences. However, we remand with directions that the costs imposed as to count two be stricken. Hunter v. State, 651 So.2d 1258 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995).
AFFIRMED and REMANDED, with directions.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
676 So. 2d 27, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6330, 1996 WL 325119, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parks-v-state-fladistctapp-1996.