Parks v. State

676 So. 2d 27, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6330, 1996 WL 325119
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 13, 1996
DocketNo. 95-410
StatusPublished

This text of 676 So. 2d 27 (Parks v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Parks v. State, 676 So. 2d 27, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6330, 1996 WL 325119 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this direct criminal appeal, the public defender has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Appellant has also filed a brief in proper person. Having carefully reviewed the entire record and considered the issues raised by appellant, we agree that no reversible error occurred. Accordingly, we affirm appellant’s convictions and sentences. However, we remand with directions that the costs imposed as to count two be stricken. Hunter v. State, 651 So.2d 1258 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995).

AFFIRMED and REMANDED, with directions.

WEBSTER, MICKLE and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Hunter v. State
651 So. 2d 1258 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
676 So. 2d 27, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6330, 1996 WL 325119, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parks-v-state-fladistctapp-1996.